Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Critical Social Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In and beyond New Labour: towards a new political ethics of care

Fiona Williams

University of Leeds

This article argues for a political ethics of care to balance New Labour's current preoccupation with the ethic of paid work. However, care as a practice invokes different experiences, meanings, contexts and multiple relations of power. With this in mind, the article traces the development of the concept of care taking up, in particular, challenges and differences raised by disability, ‘race’ and migration. These offer important insights for a new political ethics of care whose key dimensions are spelled out in the final part of the article.

Key Words: care • disability • New Labour • ‘race’ • work/life balance

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 21, No. 4, 467-493 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/026101830102100405


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
H. M. Dahl
New Public Management, care and struggles about recognition
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2009; 29(4): 634 - 654.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
T. Kroger
Care research and disability studies: Nothing in common?
Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2009; 29(3): 398 - 420.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SOC POLHome page
R. McManus
Work-Life Balance: A Case of Technical Disempowerment?
Soc. Pol., March 1, 2009; 16(1): 111 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
M. Barnes
Passionate participation: Emotional experiences and expressions in deliberative forums
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2008; 28(4): 461 - 481.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
A. Meeuwisse
Organizational innovation in the Swedish welfare state
Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2008; 28(2): 187 - 210.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
P. Wilcox
Communities, care and domestic violence
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2006; 26(4): 722 - 747.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
L. Lloyd
A Caring Profession? The Ethics of Care and Social Work with Older People
Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2006; 36(7): 1171 - 1185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DementiaHome page
T. Brannelly
Negotiating ethics in dementia care: An analysis of an ethic of care in practice
Dementia, May 1, 2006; 5(2): 197 - 212.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
R. Lister
Children (but not women) first: New Labour, child welfare and gender
Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2006; 26(2): 315 - 335.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
B. Featherstone
Rethinking Family Support in the Current Policy Context
Br. J. Soc. Work, January 1, 2006; 36(1): 5 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
P. Cambridge, R. Forrester-Jones, J. Carpenter, A. Tate, M. Knapp, J. Beecham, and A. Hallam
The State of Care Management in Learning Disability and Mental Health Services 12 Years into Community Care
Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2005; 35(7): 1039 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
C. Barnes and G. Mercer
Disability, work, and welfare: challenging the social exclusion of disabled people
Work Employment Society, September 1, 2005; 19(3): 527 - 545.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
W. M. LIMBERT and H. E. BULLOCK
'Playing the Fool': US Welfare Policy from a Critical Race Perspective
Feminism Psychology, August 1, 2005; 15(3): 253 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
L. McDowell
Love, money, and gender divisions of labour: some critical reflections on welfare-to-work policies in the UK
J. Econ. Geogr., June 1, 2005; 5(3): 365 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
B. Hughes, L. McKie, D. Hopkins, and N. Watson
Love's Labours Lost? Feminism, the Disabled People's Movement and an Ethic of Care
Sociology, April 1, 2005; 39(2): 259 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
F. Williams
What Matters is who Works: Why Every Child Matters to New Labour. Commentary on the DfES Green Paper Every Child Matters
Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2004; 24(3): 406 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
N. Watson, L. McKie, B. Hughes, D. Hopkins, and S. Gregory
(Inter)Dependence, Needs and Care: The Potential for Disability and Feminist Theorists to Develop an Emancipatory Model
Sociology, April 1, 2004; 38(2): 331 - 350.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
D. Baines
Pro-Market, Non-Market: The Dual Nature of Organizational Change in Social Services Delivery
Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2004; 24(1): 5 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
S. Duncan and F. Williams
Introduction
Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2002; 22(1): 5 - 11.
[PDF]