Critical Social Policy

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levitas, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Critical Social Policy, Vol. 16, No. 46, 5-20 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026101839601604601


Other

The concept of social exclusion and the new Durkheimian hegemony

Ruth Levitas

University of Bristol

This article argues that the concept of social exclusion, which was orig inally developed to describe the manifold consequences of poverty and inequality, has become embedded as a crucial element within a new hegemonic discourse. Within this discourse, terms such as social co hesion and solidarity abound, and social exclusion is contrasted not with inclusion but with integration, construed as integration into the labour market. The paper analyses the operation of this discourse in recent pol icy documents from the European Union and the Borrie Report, as well as in the work of Will Hutton. The discourse is described as fundamen tally Durkheimian because it treats social divisions which are endemic to capitalism as resulting from an abnormal breakdown in the social co hesion which should be maintained by the division of labour. The article argues that, within this discourse, the concept of social exclusion oper ates both to devalue unpaid work and to obscure the inequalities between paid workers, as well as to obscure the fundamental social division be tween the property-owning class and the rest of society.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
A. Cameron
Geographies of welfare and exclusion: reconstituting the `public'
Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2007; 31(4): 519 - 526.
[PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
P. M. Garrett
Making 'Anti-Social Behaviour': A Fragment on the Evolution of 'ASBO Politics' in Britain
Br. J. Soc. Work, July 1, 2007; 37(5): 839 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
T. Seddon
Drugs, Crime and Social Exclusion: Social Context and Social Theory in British Drugs-Crime Research
Br. J. Criminol., July 1, 2006; 46(4): 680 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
A. Cameron
Geographies of welfare and exclusion: social inclusion and exception
Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2006; 30(3): 396 - 404.
[PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
P. Squires
New Labour and the politics of antisocial behaviour
Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2006; 26(1): 144 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
R. Meade
We hate it here, please let us stay! Irish social partnership and the community/voluntary sector's conflicted experiences of recognition
Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2005; 25(3): 349 - 373.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
A. Cameron
Geographies of welfare and exclusion: initial report
Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2005; 29(2): 194 - 203.
[PDF]


Home page
International Social WorkHome page
A. Yeung, R. C.M. Chau, and S. W.K. Yu
Managing social exclusion: The strategies used by managerial women in Guangzhou and Hong Kong
International Social Work, October 1, 2004; 47(4): 503 - 513.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
V. P. Arapoglou
The Governance of Homelessness in Greece: Discourse and Power in the Study of Philanthropic Networks
Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2004; 24(1): 102 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
C. Edwards
Inclusion in Regeneration: A Place for Disabled People?
Urban Stud, February 1, 2001; 38(2): 267 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
A. Kearns and R. Forrest
Social Cohesion and Multilevel Urban Governance
Urban Stud, May 1, 2000; 37(5-6): 995 - 1017.
[PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
R. Atkinson
Combating Social Exclusion in Europe: The New Urban Policy Challenge
Urban Stud, May 1, 2000; 37(5-6): 1037 - 1055.
[PDF]


Home page
European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
S. Hodge and J. Howe
Can the European Social Model Survive?
European Urban and Regional Studies, April 1, 1999; 6(2): 178 - 184.
[PDF]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
J. Andersen
Post-industrial Solidarity or Meritocracy?
Acta Sociologica, January 1, 1999; 42(4): 375 - 385.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
J. Andersen and J. E. Larsen
Gender, poverty and empowerment
Critical Social Policy, May 1, 1998; 18(55): 241 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
H. Graham
Promoting health against inequality: using research to identify targets for intervention -- a case study of women and smoking
Health Education Journal, January 1, 1998; 57(4): 292 - 302.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
L. Morris
A Cluster of Contradictions: The Politics of Migration in the European Union
Sociology, May 1, 1997; 31(2): 241 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
D. Byrne
Social exclusion and capitalism: The reserve army across time and space
Critical Social Policy, February 1, 1997; 17(50): 27 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]