|
|
Equal shares: rights for fathers or recognition for children?
Carol Smart
University of Leeds, c.c.smart{at}leeds.ac.uk
The fathers’ rights movement in England has recently been given a huge boost by the involvement of Bob Geldof who has become their influential mouthpiece in the media and elsewhere. The movement has also diversified and adopted more high profile tactics more akin to those used in Australia and New Zealand. These tactics have challenged family law to adopt a principle of pure equality between mothers and fathers and demands that, on divorce or separation, children should be shared equally. In this paper it is argued that this demand ignores entirely the experiences of children who have lived an ‘equal shares’ arrangement for many years and that it reduces children to passive objects who can have no voice in a system designed only to create equality between adults. It is argued that rather than pushing the principles of family law back towards simplistic notions of equality, what is needed is a policy based on recognition rather than rights.
Key Words: contact • divorce • family • parents’ rights • residence
References
- Advisory Board on Family Law: Children Act Sub-Committee (2000) A Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Question of Parental Contact in Cases Where There is Domestic Violence. London: Lord Chancellor’s Department .
- Advisory Board on Family Law: Children Act Sub-Committee (2002a) Making Contact Work: A Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Facilitation of Arrangements for Contact Between Children and their Non-residential Parents and the Enforcement of Court Orders for Contact. London: Lord Chancellor’s Department .
- Advisory Board on Family Law: Children Act Sub-Committee (2002b) Children Act Sub-Committee Guidelines for ‘Good Practice on Parental Contact Cases Where There is Domestic Violence’: A Summary Report on Findings From the Lord Chancellor’s Department’s Survey to Monitor Awareness of the Guidelines. London: Lord Chancellor’s Department .
- Bailey-Harris, R., Barron, J. and Pearce, J. (1999a) ‘Settlement Culture and the Use of the "No Order" Principle under the Children Act 1989’ , Child and Family Law Quarterly 11: 53-62 .
- Bailey-Harris, R., Barron, J. and Pearce, J. (1999b) ‘From Utility to Rights? The Presumption of Contact in Practice’ , International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 13: 111-131 .[Abstract]
- Buchanan, A., Hunt, J., Bretherton, H. and Bream, V. (2001) Families in Conflict: Perspectives of Children and Parents on the Family Court Welfare Service. Bristol: Policy Press .
- Butler, I., Scanlan, L., Robinson, M., Douglas, G. and Murch, M. (2003) Divorcing Children: Children’s Experiences of their Parents’ Divorce. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers .
- Fraser, N. (2001) ‘Recognition without Ethics’ , Theory, Culture and Society 18(2-3): 21-42 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Geldof, B. (2003) ‘The Real Love that Dare not Speak its Name’, pp. 171-200 in A. Bainham, B. Londley, M. Richards and L. Trinder (eds) Children and Their Families: Contact, Rights and Welfare. Oxford: Hart Publishing .
- Henricson, C. (2003) Government and Parenting. London: National Family and Parenting Institute .
- Honneth, A. (1995) The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press .
- Honneth, A. (2001) ‘Recognition or Redistribution? Changing Perspectives on the Moral Order of Society’ , Theory, Culture and Society 18(2-3): 43-56 .[Free Full Text]
- Hunt, J. (2003) Researching Contact. London: National Council for One Parent Families .
- James, Adrian L. and James, Allison (1999) ‘Pump Up the Volume: Listening to Children in Separation and Divorce’ , Childhood 6: 189-206 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lister, R. (2001) ‘Towards a Citizen’s Welfare State: The 3 + 2 R’s of Welfare Reform’ , Theory, Culture and Society 18(2-3): 91-111 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lowe, N. and Murch, M. (2001) ‘Children’s Participation in the Family Justice System - Translating Principles into Practice’ , Child and Family Law Quarterly 13: 137-158 .
- Lyon, C., Surrey, E. and Timms, J. (1999) Effective Support Services for Children and Young People When Parental Relationships Break Down. London: National Youth Advocacy and the Gulbenkian Foundation .
- Masson, J. and Winn Oakley, M. (1999) Out of Hearing. London: Wiley .
- Neale, B. and Wade, A. (2001) Parent Problems! London: Young Voice .
- Smart, C. (2002) ‘From Children’s Shoes to Children’s Voices’ , Family Court Review: An International Journal 40(3): 305-317 .
- Smart, C., Neale, B. and Wade, A. (2001) The Changing Experience of Childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press .
- Smart, C., May, V., Wade, A. and Furniss, C. (2003) Residence and Contact Disputes in Court, Volume 1. Research Series No. 6/03, pp. 138. London: Department for Constitutional Affairs .
- Williams, F. (1999) ‘Good Enough Principles for Welfare’ , Journal of Social Policy 28(4): 667-687 .[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Critical Social Policy, Vol. 24, No. 4,
484-503 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0261018304046673
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
A. Mumford
Towards a Fiscal Sociology of Tax Credits and the Fathers' Rights Movement
Social Legal Studies,
June 1, 2008;
17(2):
217 - 235.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Harrison
Implacably Hostile or Appropriately Protective?: Women Managing Child Contact in the Context of Domestic Violence
Violence Against Women,
April 1, 2008;
14(4):
381 - 405.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. B. Wilson
The Non-Resident Parental Role for Separated Fathers: A Review
Int J Law Policy Family,
December 1, 2006;
20(3):
286 - 316.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. H. Ottosen
In the Name of The Father, The Child and The Holy Genes: Constructions of 'The Child's Best Interest' in Legal Disputes Over Contact
Acta Sociologica,
March 1, 2006;
49(1):
29 - 46.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
