Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Critical Social Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Connor, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

We're onto you

A critical examination of the Department for Work and Pensions' `Targeting Benefit Fraud' campaign

Stuart Connor

University of Wolverhampton

This article examines the use of imagery and language in New Labour's attempts to shift public attitudes to benefit fraud. A critical discourse analysis of the Department for Work and Pensions' `Targeting Benefit Fraud' campaign is provided, where it is argued that the campaign portrays those who commit fraud as a threatening other, whose presence necessitates and legitimates the government's increased use of technical, legislative and punitive mechanisms for managing `problem populations'. As a whole, the campaign represents a `politics of enforcement' that is derived from and helps constitute a moral authoritarianism. It is argued that the Targeting Benefit Fraud campaign needs to be understood, not just as an attempt to educate or inform the public about the problems of benefit fraud, but as part of a raft of measures that attempt to legitimize an `employment first' welfare state and reconfigure relationships between citizens and the state.

Key Words: discourse • imagery • language • New Labour • welfare

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 27, No. 2, 231-252 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0261018306075712


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?