Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Critical Social Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Critical policy evaluation and the question of values: a psychosocial approach

David Taylor

University of Brighton

This paper proposes a tentative approach to critical policy evaluation. It does so through a central focus on values. It suggests that emerging psychosocial approaches to welfare provide a useful way of considering values associated with the subjective dimension of welfare. Evaluation is presented as discursively constructed within political, scientific and popular discourses. It is a socially situated practice, whose meaning and methodology are contested by politicians, policy-makers, evaluation commissioners, welfare practitioners, professional evaluators and users of services. Contestation is approached as a methodological issue and a question of power. In this respect, evaluation is seen as part of a governance strategy but the argument seeks to avoid the tendency towards functionalism of some recent accounts of evaluation as governance. Instead, the question is approached by considering the role of values in evaluation. The article seeks to relate what are referred to as the internal valuesthat guide evaluation practice with the external values of political critique.

Key Words: governance • participation • policy evaluation • psychosocial welfare • service user control • values

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 26, No. 1, 243-267 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0261018306059774


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
K. Valentine
Evidence, values and drug treatment policy
Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2009; 29(3): 443 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
P. Stenner and D. Taylor
Psychosocial welfare: Reflections on an emerging field
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2008; 28(4): 415 - 437.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
K. Broadhurst, C. Mason, and C. Grover
Sure Start and the `re-authorization' of Section 47 child protection practices
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2007; 27(4): 443 - 461.
[Abstract] [PDF]