Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Critical Social Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Undoing an activist response: feminism and the Australian government's domestic violence policy

Ruth Phillips

University of Sydney, Australia

After nine years of socially conservative government in Australia, national domestic violence policy has shifted its focus from a ‘ womencentred’ and gender-based analytic framework to one that favours the family and reflects individualized, relational explanations of this crucial social policy issue. In exploring this issue, first this paper discusses what is meant by feminism in this context, some of the implications arising out of competing ideas amongst feminist activists in Australia and how feminism drove and influenced national policy. Second, through an examination of the current Australian government's efforts and decisions in relation to its only significant policy response to domestic violence, ‘Partnerships Against Domestic Violence’, this paper explores the implications of the socially conservative approach of the Howard Coalition Government and why it appears anti-feminist. Through a brief analysis of a national public education campaign launched in 2004, allocation of recent funding and the government's broad political approach to women's policy practice and implementation, questions are raised about the future of a policy that ignores the relationships between domestic violence and gender relations.

Key Words: feminist frameworks • social conservatism • social policy • women's citizenship

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 26, No. 1, 192-219 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0261018306059771


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AffiliaHome page
C. Zufferey
Making Gender Visible: Social Work Responses to Homelessness
Affilia, November 1, 2009; 24(4): 382 - 393.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
S. Murray and A. Powell
"What's the Problem?": Australian Public Policy Constructions of Domestic and Family Violence
Violence Against Women, May 1, 2009; 15(5): 532 - 552.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Legal StudiesHome page
A. Powell and S. Murray
Children and Domestic Violence: Constructing a Policy Problem in Australia and New Zealand
Social Legal Studies, December 1, 2008; 17(4): 453 - 473.
[Abstract] [PDF]