Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Critical Social Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tisdall, E. K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Antisocial behaviour legislation meets children's services: challenging perspectives on children, parents and the state

E. Kay M. Tisdall

University of Edinburgh

The balance between children, parents, and the state shifts in its nature over time and indeed is not necessarily consistent in, nor across, policy arenas. This paper examines one such shift, where the introduction of antisocial behaviour legislation has clashed with that of children's welfare services. The Antisocial Behaviour etc. (Scotland) Act 2004 reifies distinctions between deserving and undeserving children, between good and bad parents, and between troubled and troublesome children. It demonstrates certain continuities in constructions of childhood and parenthood – i.e. children as the responsibility of their parents – but also much change – i.e. the ‘competent child’ largely replaces the ‘needy child’. The state, in its various forms, must be able to intervene over an increased breadth of behaviour and to patrol public space. The ‘community’ gains a legal place, through new appeals to the state to control public space and to control the behaviour of children.

Key Words: childhood • parenthood • public space • welfare

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 26, No. 1, 101-120 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0261018306059767


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
M. Raco
Securing Sustainable Communities: Citizenship, Safety and Sustainability in the New Urban Planning
European Urban and Regional Studies, October 1, 2007; 14(4): 305 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
P. M. Garrett
Making 'Anti-Social Behaviour': A Fragment on the Evolution of 'ASBO Politics' in Britain
Br. J. Soc. Work, July 1, 2007; 37(5): 839 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]