This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Worley, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

‘It’s not about race. It’s about the community’: New Labour and ‘community cohesion’

University of Huddersfield, c.l.worley{at}hud.ac.uk

‘Community cohesion’ is widely regarded as the ‘new’ framework governing race relations policy in the UK. It emerged in government discourse following the civil disturbances that occurred in several northern UK towns in 2001, and has rapidly become absorbed within local government and related organizations to replace previous attempts of multiculturalism. This paper examines several key characteristics of this agenda. In particular, I explore ‘slippages’ in language within and around discourses of ‘community cohesion’. I demonstrate how ‘community’ is central to the community cohesion agenda, and suggest that whilst the concept of ‘community’ is highly ambiguous, it has continuing resonance in New Labour policymaking. The concept of ‘community’ has particular implications for processes of race and gender. Talking about ‘communities’ enables for language to become deracialized, whilst at the same time the language of community cohesion draws upon earlier discourses of assimilation through notions of ‘integration’. The community cohesion agenda is also gendered, and as suggested in this paper, has specific implications for women and the construction of ‘cultures’.

Key Words: Asian • assimilation • gender • multiculturalism • race

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 25, No. 4, 483-496 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0261018305057026


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Strier Community Anti-Poverty Strategies: A Conceptual Framework for a Critical Discussion Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2009; 39(6): 1063 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Rogowski Towards a hundred issues of Critical Social Policy Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2009; 29(3): 322 - 329. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. MacLeavy (Re)Analysing Community Empowerment: Rationalities and Technologies of Government in Bristol's New Deal for Communities Urban Stud, April 1, 2009; 46(4): 849 - 875. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Kilic The British Veil Wars Soc. Pol., December 1, 2008; 15(4): 433 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Herbert, J. May, J. Wills, K. Datta, Y. Evans, and C. McIlwaine Multicultural Living?: Experiences of Everyday Racism Among Ghanaian Migrants in London European Urban and Regional Studies, April 1, 2008; 15(2): 103 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. K. Gosling Regenerating Communities: Women's Experiences of Urban Regeneration Urban Stud, March 1, 2008; 45(3): 607 - 626. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. H. Cheong, R. Edwards, H. Goulbourne, and J. Solomos Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: A critical review Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2007; 27(1): 24 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Jordan New Labour: choice and values Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2005; 25(4): 427 - 446. [Abstract] [PDF]