Critical Social Policy

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Worley, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Critical Social Policy, Vol. 25, No. 4, 483-496 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0261018305057026
© 2005 Critical Social Policy Ltd

‘It’s not about race. It’s about the community’: New Labour and ‘community cohesion’

Claire Worley

University of Huddersfield, c.l.worley{at}hud.ac.uk

‘Community cohesion’ is widely regarded as the ‘new’ framework governing race relations policy in the UK. It emerged in government discourse following the civil disturbances that occurred in several northern UK towns in 2001, and has rapidly become absorbed within local government and related organizations to replace previous attempts of multiculturalism. This paper examines several key characteristics of this agenda. In particular, I explore ‘slippages’ in language within and around discourses of ‘community cohesion’. I demonstrate how ‘community’ is central to the community cohesion agenda, and suggest that whilst the concept of ‘community’ is highly ambiguous, it has continuing resonance in New Labour policymaking. The concept of ‘community’ has particular implications for processes of race and gender. Talking about ‘communities’ enables for language to become deracialized, whilst at the same time the language of community cohesion draws upon earlier discourses of assimilation through notions of ‘integration’. The community cohesion agenda is also gendered, and as suggested in this paper, has specific implications for women and the construction of ‘cultures’.

Key Words: Asian • assimilation • gender • multiculturalism • race


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
J. Herbert, J. May, J. Wills, K. Datta, Y. Evans, and C. McIlwaine
Multicultural Living?: Experiences of Everyday Racism Among Ghanaian Migrants in London
European Urban and Regional Studies, April 1, 2008; 15(2): 103 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban StudHome page
V. K. Gosling
Regenerating Communities: Women's Experiences of Urban Regeneration
Urban Stud, March 1, 2008; 45(3): 607 - 626.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
R. Strier
Community Anti-Poverty Strategies: A Conceptual Framework for a Critical Discussion
Br. J. Soc. Work, January 23, 2008; (2008) bcm149v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Critical Social PolicyHome page
P. H. Cheong, R. Edwards, H. Goulbourne, and J. Solomos
Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: A critical review
Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2007; 27(1): 24 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Critical Social PolicyHome page
B. Jordan
New Labour: choice and values
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2005; 25(4): 427 - 446.
[Abstract] [PDF]