This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jordan, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

New Labour: choice and values

University of Plymouth, Bill.Jordan{at}plymouth.ac.uk

In the general election of May, 2005, the word ‘respect’ denoted New Labour’s latest attempt to remoralize UK society. This article argues that there is a contradiction between individual choice, as the basis for reforming public services, and the agenda for citizenship and cohesion. The latter requires services to provide a collective context for convivial and co-operative social relations. New Labour’s third term will increasingly raise issues about the nature of human well-being in an affluent service economy.

Key Words: cohesion • respect • services • well-being

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 25, No. 4, 427-446 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0261018305057023


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Rogowski Towards a hundred issues of Critical Social Policy Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2009; 29(3): 322 - 329. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Sanders Kerbcrawler rehabilitation programmes: Curing the `deviant' male and reinforcing the `respectable' moral order Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2009; 29(1): 77 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]