This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Malloch, M. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Not ‘Fragrant’ at all: Criminal Justice Responses to ‘Risky’ Women

University of Stirling, m.s.malloch{at}stir.ac.uk

Illegal drug use has been increasingly implicated in offending behaviour and can have adverse social consequences for the individuals who come to the attention of the criminal justice system. However, the consequences are particularly problematic for women, for whom the use of ‘hard drugs’ is considered highly inappropriate, if increasingly common. This paper will consider the ways in which women drug users are depicted as ‘risky’ women, and will highlight policy responses. It will examine the application of concepts of ‘responsibilization’ and consider how this is applied to women drug using offenders. The paper will examine the theoretical basis for the differential depiction of drug users on the basis of gender, and will critically analyse the consequences of this for women drug users throughout their contact with the criminal justice system and related service provisions.

Key Words: drug use • gender • punishment • policy

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 24, No. 3, 385-405 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0261018304044365


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Sanders Kerbcrawler rehabilitation programmes: Curing the `deviant' male and reinforcing the `respectable' moral order Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2009; 29(1): 77 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]