Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Critical Social Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahlberg, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Warsame, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘It’s Only a Tradition’: Making Sense of Eradication Interventions and the Persistence of Female ‘Circumcision’ within a Swedish Context

Beth Maina Ahlberg

Skaraborg Institute for Research and Development, SwedenBeth{at}skaraborginstitute.se

Ingela Krantz

Umeå University, Sweden

Gunilla Lindmark

Univesity of Uppsala, Sweden

Marian Warsame

Karolinska Institute, Sweden

This paper questions why female circumcision (FC) persists despite eradication interventions and the migration of people to non-practising countries and discusses the reasoning of Somali immigrants on female circumcision. It is based on interviews with diverse groups and individuals in the Somali community, mostly refugees in Sweden. Paradoxes implying denial and avoidance emerged. Female circumcision was described, as just ‘a tradition’ that has little to do with Islam. The fear of bringing up an uncircumcised daughter in the liberal sexual morality of Sweden was mentioned as a dilemma. Circumcised women said the health care they received during pregnancy and childbirth was poor while the law failed to take account of the experiences of the Somali people. We conclude that rather than eradication, interventions seem to have silenced and stigmatized the practice due to their failure to take account of its meanings, organization and contexts, including the diasporic dynamics within which immigrants negotiate identities.

Key Words: criminalization • diaspora • identity • stigma

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 24, No. 1, 50-78 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0261018304241003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Transcult NursHome page
V. Berggren, S. Bergstrom, and A.-K. Edberg
Being Different and Vulnerable: Experiences of Immigrant African Women Who Have Been Circumcised and Sought Maternity Care in Sweden
J Transcult Nurs, January 1, 2006; 17(1): 50 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
S. Johnsdotter and B. Essen
It is only a tradition: making sense of Swedish Somalis' narratives of female circumcision and avoiding submission to hegemonic political discourse
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2005; 25(4): 577 - 589.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
B. M. Ahlberg, I. Krantz, G. Lindmark, and M. Warsame
A reply to Johnsdotter and Essen
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2005; 25(4): 590 - 595.
[PDF]