Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Critical Social Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scourfield, J.
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Risk, Reflexivity and Social Control in Child Protection: New Times or same Old Story?

Jonathan Scourfield

Cardiff University, scourfield{at}cf.ac.uk

Ian Welsh

Cardiff University

The article addresses some recent attempts to reassess the contemporary child protection system as potentially liberating. These are, first, discussions of child protection in the context of theories of reflexive modernization and the risk society, and, second, postmodernist feminist writings. After initial theoretical debate about some of these perspectives, the authors go on to present ethnographic research evidence showing that social control is alive and well in child protection work. The article concludes that, while these recent optimistic accounts of the child protection system are welcome contributions, they have overstated the liberating potentials of the current system. While much of the discussion deals with child protection specifically, another aim of the article is to contribute to a debate about the application to social policy in general of theories of reflexive modernization and the risk society.

Key Words: child abuse • child welfare • gender • postmodernism • reflexive modernization

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 23, No. 3, 398-420 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/02610183030233005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SociologyHome page
J. Donoghue
Antisocial Behaviour Orders (ASBOs) in Britain: Contextualizing Risk and Reflexive Modernization
Sociology, April 1, 2008; 42(2): 337 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
H. D'Cruz, P. Gillingham, and S. Melendez
Reflexivity, its Meanings and Relevance for Social Work: A Critical Review of the Literature
Br. J. Soc. Work, January 1, 2007; 37(1): 73 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]