This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Scourfield, J. Articles by Drakeford, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

New Labour and the `problem of men'

Cardiff University, scourfield{at}cf.ac.uk

Mark Drakeford

Cardiff University

The New Labour government has arguably broken new ground by making `masculinity policy'. Whereas the policy process is always inevitably gendered, with implications for men as well as women, it is only in the last few years that a government has made quite such explicit references to men in some areas of policy. The most high-profile initiatives have been in relation to fathering and the education of boys. In this article, we make out a case that New Labour proceeds with policy optimism about men in the home and pessimism about men outside the home. In contrast, there has been policy pessimism about women in the home and optimism about women outside the home. Where New Labour is optimistic, it tends to produce policies that are encouraging and facilitative, and where New Labour is pessimistic, it can produce policies that are authoritarian.

Key Words: criminal justice • education • fathering • gender • masculinity

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 22, No. 4, 619-640 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/02610183020220040401


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Gillies Understandings and Experiences of Involved Fathering in the United Kingdom: Exploring Classed Dimensions The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, July 1, 2009; 624(1): 49 - 60. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Walker 'My Son Gave Birth to Me': Offending Fathers--Generative, Reflexive and Risky? Br. J. Soc. Work, May 26, 2009; (2009) bcp063v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Sanders Kerbcrawler rehabilitation programmes: Curing the `deviant' male and reinforcing the `respectable' moral order Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2009; 29(1): 77 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Scanlon and J. Adlam Refusal, social exclusion and the cycle of rejection: A cynical analysis? Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2008; 28(4): 529 - 549. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Broadhurst, C. Mason, and C. Grover Sure Start and the `re-authorization' of Section 47 child protection practices Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2007; 27(4): 443 - 461. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Featherstone Why gender matters in child welfare and protection Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2006; 26(2): 294 - 314. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Lister Children (but not women) first: New Labour, child welfare and gender Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2006; 26(2): 315 - 335. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Scourfield The challenge of engaging fathers in the child protection process Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2006; 26(2): 440 - 449. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Giullari and M. Shaw Supporting or controlling? New Labour's housing strategy for teenage parents Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2005; 25(3): 402 - 417. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Gillies Meeting parents' needs? Discourses of 'support' and 'inclusion' in family policy Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2005; 25(1): 70 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Milner From 'Disappearing' to 'Demonized': The Effects on Men and Women of Professional Interventions Based on Challenging Men Who Are Violent Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2004; 24(1): 79 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF]