Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Critical Social Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garrett, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Encounters in the new welfare domains of the Third Way: social work, the Connexions agency and personal advisers

Paul Michael Garrett

University of Nottingham, paul.garrett{at}nottingham.ac.uk

In England, the Connexions service is to provide a universal service which is to inform, advise and guide young people aged 13—19 years old. The role of the agency and the personal advisers `at the heart' of the scheme is also likely to have a major impact on other professionals working with children and families, such as social workers. A number of initiatives introduced by New Labour have already resulted in the marginalization of social work. Personal advisers and other `new emergent professionals', such as mentors, also provide evidence of cultural transformations that are being promoted in terms of how best to properly engage with children and families. It is critically important to respond to the range of discourses that are identifiable in the Connexions strategy. These are centred on: youth transitions; social exclusion and disaffection; risk and the surveillance of young people. In the latter context, particular concerns relate to a database or `register' of all those aged 13—19 and a Connexions Card which tracks `progress' in education and the `world of work', and which provides `rewards' for compliance.

Key Words: risk • surveillance • transitions • youth

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 22, No. 4, 596-618 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/02610183020220040301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
F. Coussee, G. Roets, and M. De Bie
Empowering the powerful: Challenging hidden processes of marginalization in youth work policy and practice in Belgium
Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2009; 29(3): 421 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
R. Munford and J. Sanders
Borders, margins and bridges: Possibilities for change for marginalized young women
Community Dev. J., July 1, 2007; 42(3): 317 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
K. Artaraz
The wrong person for the job? Professional habitus and working cultures in Connexions
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2006; 26(4): 910 - 931.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
J. Kidger
Including Young Mothers: Limitations to New Labour's Strategy for Supporting Teenage Parents
Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2004; 24(3): 291 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
P. Mizen
The Best Days of your Life? Youth, Policy and Blair's New Labour
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2003; 23(4): 453 - 476.
[Abstract] [PDF]