Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Critical Social Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The local state of immigration controls

Steve Cohen

Immigration Lawyer, Manchester

Following the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999, it is manifest that local authorities have a central role in the implementation of immigration control and the policing of asylum seekers and others subject to controls. The forced dispersal of asylum seekers and the linking of essential local authority administered welfare services to immigration status represent the integration of the local state into internal immigration controls and the transformation of local government into an arm of the Home Office. The present article is critical of this collusion. It argues that municipal government should reject any idea of having a benevolent role in ameliorating the condition of asylum seekers by being a party to the dispersal scheme. However, the article goes beyond the immediacy of current legislation. It shows that there are historic connections between local government and immigration controls stretching back to the origins of modern controls at the start of the last century. The conclusion is that immigration controls are inherently, institutionally racist and that local authorities should reject all involvement in their enforcement.

Key Words: asylum seekers • local government • racism • welfare

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 22, No. 3, 518-543 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/026101830202200308


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Social WorkHome page
L. Briskman and S. Cemlyn
Reclaiming humanity for asylum-seekers: A social work response
International Social Work, November 1, 2005; 48(6): 714 - 724.
[Abstract] [PDF]