Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Critical Social Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bacchi, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beasley, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Citizen bodies: is embodied citizenship a contradiction in terms?

Carol Lee Bacchi

University of Adelaide, carol.bacchi{at}adelaide.edu.au

Chris Beasley

University of Adelaide, chris.beasley{at}adelaide.edu.au

In this article, we draw connections between notions of embodiment and conceptions of citizenship to provide insights into contemporary debates about desirable modes of governance. We suggest that there is a need to challenge the instrumental conception of bodies which informs much public policy (our examples are New Reproductive Technologies and cosmetic surgery in Australia), and which underlies much citizenship theory, both feminist and mainstream. We identify a demarcation in our selected policies between those presumed to have control over their bodies and those presumed to be controlled by their bodies. The former are designated `autonomous citizens' (with autonomous meaning distance from government oversight), while the latter are constituted as lesser citizens in need of forms of control. Women appear on both sides of the dichotomy, but in ways which leave them invisible as political subjects. We coin the term `social flesh' to capture a vision of interacting, material, embodied subjects and initiate consideration of the forms of governance that might be appropriate for embodied citizens.

Key Words: cosmetic surgery • feminism • new reproductive technologies

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 22, No. 2, 324-352 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/02610183020220020801
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 European Journal of Women's StudiesHome page
L. Smyth
Gendered Spaces and Intimate Citizenship: The Case of Breastfeeding
European Journal of Women's Studies, May 1, 2008; 15(2): 83 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Feminist TheoryHome page
C. Beasley and C. Bacchi
Envisaging a new politics for an ethical future: Beyond trust, care and generosity towards an ethic of `social flesh'
Feminist Theory, December 1, 2007; 8(3): 279 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SexualitiesHome page
E. Grabham
Citizen Bodies, Intersex Citizenship
Sexualities, February 1, 2007; 10(1): 29 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]