This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jones, D. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Madness, the family and psychiatry

Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, djones01{at}bcuc.ac.uk

It is argued that an important factor behind the lack of direction in current policies towards serious mental illness has been the failure to critique properly the highly entwined relationship between the discourses of psychiatry and `the family'. Interviews carried out with an ethnically diverse group of Londoners, who had a relative diagnosed as suffering from serious mental illness, suggest that while the families have an allegiance to a medical model, they are also actively and critically appropriating psychiatric discourse. Closer examination suggests that concerns about sexuality and people's apparent ability to engage successfully with intimate relationships are prominent among the criteria that family members use to judge sanity. A certain amount of historical explication is necessary to put these observations into context, since there has been so little critical analysis of the role that families play in psychiatry. A number of points can be made from the known histories of asylums and psychiatry that suggest that families and familial ideologies were significantly involved in defining ideas of insanity during both the rise and demise of asylum. On the one hand, idealizations of familial and emotional life came to be seen as connected to the causes and treatments of sanity. On the other hand, families were themselves actively involved in the construction of the asylums since they were choosing to commit relatives they deemed to be mad. These historical observations can help illuminate material from contemporary interviews with families. It is argued that our contemporary understandings of mental illnesses are immanent to ideas of family and emotional life.

Key Words: asylum • community care • mental illness

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 22, No. 2, 247-272 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/02610183020220020501


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?