This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wetherly, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Basic needs and social policies

Leeds Metropolitan University

This article is concerned with the concept of 'basic needs', its plausibility and its relevance to social policy. Of central importance in all strands of left-of-centre thought, the concept of need provides a basis for the cri tique of capitalism or the market and a justification for state interven tion. This article provides a critical response to the claim that basic needs which are objective and universal can be shown to exist. It argues, in par ticular, that this claim does not succeed in providing a standard of basic need-satisfaction that is plausible and avoids the problem of relativism. Drawing on a pilot needs audit which attempted to operationalize the theory of human need and the report of the Commission on Social Justice, the final section considers the concrete implications of basic needs for social policy and the politics of a needs-based strategy.

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 16, No. 46, 45-65 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026101839601604603


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Carey The Quasi-Market Revolution in the Head: Ideology, Discourse, Care Management Journal of Social Work, October 1, 2008; 8(4): 341 - 362. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Watson and J. West The Report of the 21st Century Social Work Review: Reviewing the `Transformational' Aspirations of a Major Public Policy Initiative in Scotland Public Policy and Administration, July 1, 2008; 23(3): 302 - 318. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Carey What difference does it make?: Contrasting organization and converging outcomes regarding the privatization of state social work in England and Canada International Social Work, January 1, 2008; 51(1): 83 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Cowden and G. Singh The 'User': Friend, foe or fetish?: A critical exploration of user involvement in health and social care Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2007; 27(1): 5 - 23. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Aronson and S. M. Neysmith Obscuring the costs of home care: restructuring at work Work Employment Society, March 1, 2006; 20(1): 27 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Baines Caring for Nothing: Work Organization and Unwaged Labour in Social Services Work Employment Society, June 1, 2004; 18(2): 267 - 295. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Baines Pro-Market, Non-Market: The Dual Nature of Organizational Change in Social Services Delivery Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2004; 24(1): 5 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Carey Anatomy of a Care Manager Work Employment Society, March 1, 2003; 17(1): 121 - 135. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Holden The Internationalization of Long Term Care Provision: Economics and Strategy Global Social Policy, April 1, 2002; 2(1): 47 - 67. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Larson, I. Frkovic, M. van Kooten-Prasad, and L. Manderson Mental Health Needs Assessment in Australia's Culturally Diverse Society Transcultural Psychiatry, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 333 - 347. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. M. Garrett Producing the moral citizen: the 'Looking After Children' system and the regulation of children and young people in public care Critical Social Policy, August 1, 1999; 19(3): 291 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF]