This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Thompson, S. Articles by Hoggett, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Universalism, selectivism and particularism

Towards a postmodern social policy

University of the West of England, Bristol

Paul Hoggett

University of the West of England, Bristol

The impact of postmodernism on theories of social policy has called into question the established basis of welfare provision. Existing compromises between universalism and particularism, equality and diversity, have been unsettled. This paper re-examines the question of the appropriate balance between these values in light of the issues postmodernism raises. Although postmodernists provide good reasons to reject crude forms of universalism, it remains possible to defend a sophisticated universalism that, while committed to equality, is able to be sensitive to diversity by incorporating significant elements of both selectivism and particularism. While the realization of such a social policy would also require an ap propriate form of welfare governance, this form can only be briefly sug gested here. In sum, it is argued that, by learning from an encounter with postmodernism, contemporary social policy can begin to combine uni versalism with particularism, equality with diversity, and consistency of treatment with group empowerment.

Critical Social Policy, Vol. 16, No. 46, 21-42 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026101839601604602


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Monro Transgender Politics in the UK Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2003; 23(4): 433 - 452. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Hunter A Critical Analysis of Approaches to the Concept of Social Identity in Social Policy Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2003; 23(3): 322 - 344. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Powell New Labour and the third way in the British welfare state: a new and distinctive approach? Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2000; 20(1): 39 - 60. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Lister Citizenship and Difference: Towards a Differentiated Universalism European Journal of Social Theory, July 1, 1998; 1(1): 71 - 90. [Abstract]

				K. Mann Lamppost modernism: traditional and critical social policy? Critical Social Policy, February 1, 1998; 18(54): 77 - 102. [Abstract] [PDF]